Conflicting rights are students have the freedom of speech they can publish the thing they want, the principle also have the freedom of speech he can say why students can’t publish these two cases on the newspaper. The interest is school’s discipline.
2. In what ways is this case similar to the Tinker case? In what ways is different?
Similar way is students have their own thoughts but all limit by the school and the conflict rights are the same both are freedom of expression. The result is different in Tinker case the students won and they have the chance to show others their thought but in this case students failed, they didn’t get their rights back their principle just took off the articles.
3. Examine each of the two opinions on Page 205. Which opinion would you select to decide this case? Explain your
reasoning.
I would select the second opinion. I agree with the principle’s thought but his action has violated the First Amendment’s prohibitions. The students have the rights to publish these two articles but they shouldn’t publish them something in the article is very private it is not suitable to publish.